Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it is thicker and heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than LG V30S ThinQ. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. LG V30S ThinQ and Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro have incredibly similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much worse count of pixels in each inch in the screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 42 percent greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a way larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.