Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3's score of 78.2. Even though the LG V30S ThinQ is way older than Xiaomi Poco M3, it's construction is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater pixels density. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco M3 takes clearer videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a very superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has an 82% bigger battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some money and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.