Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro's 80.2 general score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features and better performance. Although LG V30S ThinQ is older than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's body is lighter and a bit thinner.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a better memory capacity for apps and games than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as ZTE Axon 10 Pro. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.