Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a global score of 82.5 against 76.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the previous 8.0 Oreo version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG V30S ThinQ's design is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it was released about a year before.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ and the ZTE Axon 10s Pro both feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video definition, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
LG V30S ThinQ features more memory for apps and games than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.