Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 92.8 against 81.3. IPhone 12 Pro's body has the same thickness than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a superior processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ and the Apple iPhone 12 Pro have quite similar cameras, and although the Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory for games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 17% bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.