Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a score of 93.3 against 81.3. IPhone 13 Pro is a way newer cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ, although it's a little bit thicker and much heavier. IPhone 13 Pro has a better performing processor than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has less CPU cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 13 Pro features a little sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a just a little worse pixels count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's camera is very similar to the LG V35 ThinQ one, because although the Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a lower (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little better battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.