Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having an 88.1 score against 81.3. Even being the best in this review, iPhone X is a just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than LG V35 ThinQ. IPhone X features just a bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit worse screen density and a bit worse 1125 x 2436 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone X has a little bit better processing power than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and 3 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The LG V35 ThinQ features better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 22% bigger battery size. The Apple iPhone X captures slightly better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, a back camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.