Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. The iPhone XR body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. The iPhone XR counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The iPhone XR shoots clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a back camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, a lower video definition and a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery size.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone XR, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.