Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. The Apple iPhone XS construction is heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ. IPhone XS features just a bit better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser and slower CPU cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XS features a little bit better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a quite smaller display, a quite worse pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a little lower 1125 x 2436 resolution. The iPhone XS captures slightly better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with greater battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.