Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Asus |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-10-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Asus ROG Phone's general score of 77.1. LG V35 ThinQ is a somewhat thinner and much lighter phone than the Asus ROG Phone, although both were released only 5 months apart. Asus ROG Phone features a little faster processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Asus ROG Phone also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Asus ROG Phone, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a higher display density. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Asus ROG Phone has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus ROG Phone counts with longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.