Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Google Pixel. LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better screen than Google Pixel, because it has a bigger display, a little better pixel number in each display inch and a way better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor giving a way lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments and a way higher resolution back camera.
LG V35 ThinQ features better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.