Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having an 82.5 score against 81.3. Even though the Google Pixel 2 XL is better than LG V35 ThinQ, we must note that it is also just a little heavier and a little thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 2 XL. Both have the same pixels density, a display with the same size and the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 2 XL has just a bit better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.