Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 global score. LG V35 ThinQ's body is a bit thinner but a little heavier than Google Pixel 3, and both of them were only released 4 months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a bit better pixel number in each display inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a much more MP camera and a larger aperture.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.