Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's global score of 80.7. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ and the Google Pixel 3 XL were released only 4 months apart, the LG V35 ThinQ is a bit thinner and lighter. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2880px, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.