Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. LG V35 ThinQ's design is just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a, although it is just a bit heavier and was released just 11 months before. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, a bit more pixels per display inch and a little bigger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V35 ThinQ has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.