Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's general score of 81.3. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a bit larger display and a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 4 and LG V35 ThinQ count with really similar CPUs, both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The LG V35 ThinQ takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.