Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a general score of 82.9 against 81.3. Google Pixel 4 XL is a newer device than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's just a bit thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL has a display that's just as good as the display in LG V35 ThinQ, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
The LG V35 ThinQ and the Google Pixel 4 XL have really similar processors, they have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.