Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with an 82.9 score against 81.3. The Google Pixel 4a is a notably newer and just a little bit lighter device than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it is also a bit thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a quite larger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution camera.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.