Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 89 score against 81.3. Even though the Google Pixel 5 is just a little bit thicker than LG V35 ThinQ, it's a bit lighter and notably newer. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 5, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better display than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a just a bit better pixels quantity in each display inch and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations, a worse (4K) video quality and a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
The Google Pixel 5 has improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.