Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-07-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a, having an 81.3 score against 76.4. Despite of the fact that the LG V35 ThinQ is way older than Google Pixel 6a, it's design is thinner and lighter. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior performance than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more CPU cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a bit greater pixels quantity per display inch. The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 6a features improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4410mAh battery size. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.