Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than HTC One M9, having a general score of 81.3 against 77.7. The LG V35 ThinQ is a incredibly newer and way thinner device than HTC One M9, although it is just a little heavier. The HTC One M9 has just a bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a just a little lower screen density and a little smaller screen.
The HTC One M9 features a bit superior processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and a graphics processing unit. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity. The HTC One M9 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the HTC One M9 also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a better resolution back camera.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. If you are trying to save some money, you can get HTC One M9, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.