Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer phone, and it is also a little thinner and a bit lighter than HTC U Ultra. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better display than HTC U Ultra, because it has a just a little more pixels per display inch, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a little bit larger screen. The HTC U Ultra's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one, both of them have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a little bit longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots just a bit better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography and video and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.