Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than HTC U11's 77.6 global score. LG V35 ThinQ's design is newer, a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than HTC U11. LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better display than HTC U11, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a little higher pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V35 ThinQ captures just a bit better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a larger aperture.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a little better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the HTC U11, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.