Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-03-31 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the LG G5, with a general score of 81.3 against 76.1. The LG V35 ThinQ is a a little lighter phone than LG G5, but both of them are 0.29inches thick. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG G5, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than LG G5, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster). LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G5, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 32 GB more internal memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has superior battery life than LG G5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. The LG G5's camera is very similar to the LG V35 ThinQ one, because although the LG G5 has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate, a 16 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.