Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than LG K52's overall score of 76. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is much older than LG K52, it's construction is thinner and lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a way greater screen density. The LG K52's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the LG V35 ThinQ one, both of them have the same 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K52 has better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than LG K52, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 16 MP resolution and a lot smaller back camera sensor offering a way worse image quality, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.