Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than LG Q70, having a score of 81.3 against 77.9. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older device than the LG Q70, but LG was able to build it a lot lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. LG V35 ThinQ features a little better performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better display pixel density. The LG Q70 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
LG V35 ThinQ and LG Q70 both have quite similar memory for games and applications, both of them have an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. LG Q70 has longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.