Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the LG Stylo 6's general score of 76.7. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than LG Stylo 6, although it was released 2 years before. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. LG Stylo 6 counts with as much memory for games and applications as the LG V35 ThinQ, they have a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and equal internal memory capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a more megapixels camera in the back, a much better (4K) video resolution and a larger camera aperture. LG Stylo 6 has longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.