Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 82.5 against 81.3. LG V30S ThinQ has the same weight and thickness than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better looking display than LG V30S ThinQ. Both have the same quantity of pixels in each inch in the display, an equal 1440 x 2880 resolution and a display of the same size.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than LG V30S ThinQ. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ features a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ and LG V35 ThinQ count with extremely similar battery durations. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same resolution camera in the back.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.