Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a global score of 87.6 against 81.3. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's thicker and extremely heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ's processor is very similar to LG V35 ThinQ's processor, and although the LG V60 ThinQ has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera, a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a much better video definition.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ costs more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.