Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a general score of 87.1 against 81.3. Although the LG Velvet is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ, it's heavier and just a little thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better performance than LG Velvet. Both have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
LG Velvet has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a lot more mega pixels camera.
The LG Velvet counts with a bigger storage to store more games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG Velvet has superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 30 percent greater battery capacity.
LG Velvet costs a bit more money than LG V35 ThinQ, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.