Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting a global score of 91.2 against 81.3. The LG Wing design is incredibly newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it is noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than LG Wing, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. LG Wing has a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The LG Wing counts with a much better storage for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory capacity. The LG Wing counts with greater battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features, you can buy LG Wing, else you can save some dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.