Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-09-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Glacier |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo's 78.8 overall score. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older and much thicker than the Microsoft Surface Duo, it's body is still incredibly lighter. Microsoft Surface Duo's processor is just as good as LG V35 ThinQ's CPU, both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2880, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back camera with a much better 16 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with just a bit better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3577mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.