Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with an 85.3 score against 81.3. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a much newer and thinner phone than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it is incredibly heavier. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2's processing unit is just as good as LG V35 ThinQ's CPU, and although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG V35 ThinQ and the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 have extremely similar displays, because although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has way less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1892 x 2688px and a much bigger display. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a camera that's just as good as LG V35 ThinQ's camera, although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a much less MP back camera and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo 2, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.