Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is much better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. Although Motorola edge is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it's somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Motorola edge. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola edge counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola edge has better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36% more battery size. The Motorola edge counts with a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola edge also counts with a way bigger sensor and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola edge, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.