Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is better than LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro construction is notably newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little bit better performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.