Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) has a score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. The Motorola Edge (2022) construction is noticeably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it is just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Edge (2022). Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
The Motorola Edge (2022) shoots better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features a much longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola Edge (2022), but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.