Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2024-06-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 global score. LG V35 ThinQ is an older device than Motorola Edge (2024), but it's a bit lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Motorola Edge (2024) features a bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse display density and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The LG V35 ThinQ has more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a very superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge (2024) shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.