Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a general score of 81.3 against 78.5. LG V35 ThinQ is an extremely older device than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but LG could make it just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little bit better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures way better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.