Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2023-05-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Edge 40, with an 81.3 score against 77.2. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is a lot older than Motorola Edge 40, it's body is a little thinner and just a bit lighter. The Motorola Edge 40 has just a bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 40 has a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a much bigger sensor and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 has improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.