Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a way newer cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's somewhat thicker and much heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a screen that's just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one, because although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a lot lower count of pixels in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 39 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot higher 50 MP resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.