Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's general score of 81.3. Moto G200 5G's construction is extremely newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit superior processor than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Moto G200 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.