Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Black and Gray | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G84's 80.9 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior processor than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Moto G84 features a slightly better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density and a lot lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto G84 features a much better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G84 has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.