Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, having an 81.3 score against 76.7. LG V35 ThinQ is an a lot older phone than Motorola Moto G9 Play, but LG was able to make it much lighter and somewhat thinner. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much better looking display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a way higher pixels density. The Motorola Moto G9 Play captures better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The LG V35 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto G9 Play has a superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.