Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G9 Power's global score of 78.6. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is older than Motorola Moto G9 Power, it's construction is a lot lighter and way thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G9 Power, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G9 Power features a much better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Moto G9 Power captures a bit better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a way better 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.