Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-06-08 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. The LG V35 ThinQ is a newer and just a little lighter device than the Moto Z Force, but it is also a bit thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a bit larger screen, a just a little better display pixels density and a slightly higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z Force's camera is very similar to LG V35 ThinQ's camera, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a way better 21 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Moto Z Force and LG V35 ThinQ have quite similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force counts with a little longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.