Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Play, with an 81.3 score against 77.4. LG V35 ThinQ's design is newer, but a bit heavier and thicker than the Moto Z2 Play. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a greater screen density, a lot better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen. The Moto Z2 Play's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as LG V35 ThinQ's one, they have equal internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with lot more megapixels. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs more money than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.