Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, having a score of 84.6 against 81.3. The Motorola One 5G construction is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. Motorola One 5G counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola One 5G features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One 5G has a much longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.