Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a global score of 81.6 against 81.3. Motorola One 5G Ace's design is noticeably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it is heavier and a lot thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a much better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.