Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 score. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the Motorola One Action, it's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Motorola One Action counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola One Action features a bit better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6% greater battery size. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.