Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having an 81.3 score against 79.8. LG V35 ThinQ is an older device than Motorola One Hyper, but LG was able to build it somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM. Motorola One Hyper features just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Hyper has superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.